Subscribe News Feed Subscribe Comments

Showing posts with label Ford. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ford. Show all posts

2010 Roush Ford Mustang 427R




Subtlety. Some strive for it, while others light their hair on fire and run into traffic screaming. Consider the Roush 427R. At first ogle, it’s nearly indiscernible from a standard-issue Ford Mustang GT, especially finished with black paint and flat-black decals, as was our test car. But turn the key, and this Mustang does its best impression of one of Jack Roush’s NASCAR sleds. The noise is intoxicating. We were addicted. The throaty, hairy-chested exhaust (a $710 option you can’t afford to skip) changes the entire character of this pony car when you get on the gas, counterbalancing subtle aesthetic mods to help the Roush strike a balance between hey-look-at-me and I’m-just-an-average-Mustang.

World’s Greatest Mustang GT

To be fair, the rest of Roush’s upgrades have a positive effect on the already improved-for-2010 Mustang GT, too, and they all work to improve the car’s characteristics in a balanced way. The 4.6-liter V-8 gets new breathing equipment, a supercharger, and a reprogrammed computer that yield 435 hp and 400 lb-ft of torque, increases of 120 and 75, respectively, compared with the stock GT. (The 427 in the name is for nostalgic purposes, as the car’s output is now undersold by the decals on its flanks, and the V-8 doesn’t displace 427 cubic inches.) A suspension package goes beyond that of Ford’s Track pack and includes new front struts, different rear shocks, and new springs and anti-roll bars at both ends.

Then there are the details: A darkened pony logo nestled in the grille. A body kit that includes new front and rear fascias, a front splitter, side skirts, and a wing on the rear deck. Interior touches like aluminum pedals and our tester’s Jack Roush–besignatured seats. None of this is too much, but we could certainly do without the window louvers and a boost gauge that monopolizes space originally meant for the driver's air vent; thankfully, both items are optional. And did we mention the glorious sound the thing makes? Yep, we’re still addicted.
Specifications

VEHICLE TYPE: front-engine, rear-wheel-drive, 4-passenger, 2-door coupe

PRICE AS TESTED: 53,716 (base price: $47,296)

ENGINE TYPE: supercharged and intercooled SOHC 24-valve V-8, aluminum block and heads, port fuel injection

Displacement: 281 cu in, 4606cc
Power (SAE net): 435 bhp @ 6250 rpm
Torque (SAE net): 400 lb-ft @ 4250 rpm

TRANSMISSION: 5-speed manual

DIMENSIONS:
Wheelbase: 107.1 in Length: 188.0 in
Width: 73.8 in Height: 54.4 in
Curb weight: 3700 lb

C/D TEST RESULTS:
Zero to 60 mph: 4.7 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 10.8 sec
Zero to 130 mph: 18.8 sec
Street start, 5–60 mph: 5.3 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 13.0 sec @ 111 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 155 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.94 g

FUEL ECONOMY:
C/D observed: 14 mpg

Obvious-Comparison Time: What of the GT500?

For about the same price as this tricked-out GT, Ford will sell you its in-house-massaged Shelby GT500, which now boasts 540 hp and 510 lb-ft of torque from its supercharged 5.4-liter V-8. It’s an easy choice, right? Not so fast. In adding horses, the Shelby also adds more than 300 pounds over its front axle compared with the Track pack Mustang GT. The Roush adds 105.

Yes, the 427R is at a power deficit, but what’s there is ample. Blasts to 60 take 4.7 seconds, 0.2 second longer than the GT500, and the quarter is traveled in 13 flat at 111, 0.3 and 4 mph off the Shelby’s pace. Shifts in our 427R were accomplished by the regular GT’s five-speed manual, and the optional short-throw shifter makes the distances between ratios feel toggle-switch tight, minimizing the downtime between raucous exhaust honks. Skidpad grip of 0.94 g edges out both the Track-packed GT (0.92) and the Shelby GT500 (0.91). The handling is the best we’ve experienced in a 2010 Mustang, and the reworked suspension gives the Roush a planted feel where the GT500 is a bit too spongy. Seventy-to-zero-mph braking performance is also better with the Roush—155 feet versus the Shelby’s 165.

(All of that said, Roush will build you a Stage 3 Mustang with GT500 output for a package price of over $28,000, double that of the 427R. But we can’t see needing to spend more when the 427R feels, sounds, and looks as good as it does.)

The Sound of Unsilence

This Mustang got plenty of looks of admiration from spectators who first heard, then saw, the all-black stallion. At the same time, it drew some disapproving looks from fellow motorists and pedestrians who seemed to assume by its tone that the Roush must be up to no good—and quickly. (We weren’t always flooring it; it’s loud at times even when you’re trying to crawl through traffic.) This author would like to apologize to his neighbors—let’s say those within a one-mile radius—for any late-night arrivals or early-morning departures.

The basic 427R package includes the modified powertrain and most of the looks for $15,056 on top of a Mustang GT Premium with California emissions and a 3.55:1 rear axle ratio ($32,240). You can, of course, add things to the base Mustang—like the newly available nav system—and then pile on the options from Roush. Our tester’s Roush options amounted to an extra $6420 on the tab, but we’d happily knock that total down to $1120 for the short-throw shifter with black knob ($410) and God-sent exhaust ($710). Our car also had a $1450 brake kit that includes slotted rotors and some caliper paint, but we’d probably opt to move up to the $2877 big-brake kit (14-inch front rotors and four-piston calipers). So, after scrapping the unnecessaries and adding the bigger brakes, our personal 427R would ring in at $51,293. GT500 territory, yes, but this is a far more balanced package.

Building on what many of us believe to be the best Mustang ever, this Roush is the choice for those who want a well-rounded Stang that combines extra power with decent handling. It might not carry the flash of the Shelby or, for that matter, a Camaro, but people will certainly hear you coming, and you’ll even be able to have fun when the road goes curvy.

2010 Ford Flex EcoBoost V6



Even among people movers, the Ford Flex is particularly versatile. It’s part station wagon, part crossover, and as spacious inside as a semi-trailer. Despite finishing fourth in a six-crossover comparison test, the Flex is a unique, well-made, and beautifully packaged vehicle, albeit rather slow and unremarkable to drive with the base 262-hp, 3.5-liter V-6. But for 2010, the new twin-turbocharged, direct-injection, 355-horse EcoBoost six-cylinder is an option, and it’s being marketed as offering “V-8 performance with V-6 fuel economy.” How does adding a serious shot of horsepower affect the Flex’s appeal? And is there any truth to Ford’s EcoBoost hype?

Getting the Kids to School in a Hurry

Well, we can say that for a 4800-pound family vehicle in which you can get a second-row refrigerator—how’s that for a niche?—the twin-turbo Flex is seriously quick. With the 3.5-liter EcoBoost V-6 sending 355 hp and 350 lb-ft of torque through the standard six-speed automatic and all-wheel-drive system, our SEL tester hustled to 60 mph in six seconds flat, covered the quarter-mile in 14.6 at 96 mph, and reached a governed top speed of 123 mph. That’s nearly two seconds quicker to 60 mph and through the quarter than the last Flex we tested with all-wheel drive and the base V-6. Turbo lag is virtually nil, shifts are smooth albeit a little slow, and the exhaust note sounds about the same as that of the naturally aspirated version, so you get a big bump in speed without the boy-racer behavior you might expect from forced induction. The EcoBoost engine still swills regular unleaded, too.

Turbo models also sport a retuned suspension with stiffer springs, revised dampers, and a slightly lower ride height (by 0.4 inch), although all that didn’t really add up to a notable improvement in skidpad grip, which was 0.81 g versus 0.80 g without the revisions. But the changes, combined with optional 20-inch wheels wearing 255-series Goodyear Eagle RS-As, do help the big Flex feel more sure-footed and planted than before. The transmission’s manual mode and steering-wheel-mounted paddle shifters make the drive somewhat more involving when the road gets curvy. However, the Flex still doesn’t feel as dynamic in the twisties as did our long-term Mazda CX-9, which remains one of our favorite large, three-row crossovers.

Of our complaints, the standard 12.8-inch front and 13.0-inch rear disc brakes (same as the non-turbo model’s) are the most notable. As with most Ford brakes of late, they fade quickly and don’t feel up to repeatedly arresting the Flex’s mass from high speeds, producing a mediocre 70-to-0-mph measurement of 190 feet; an upgraded system at least for the speedy EcoBoost models would be very welcome. Other issues range from a stability-control system that can’t be completely turned off to the vague and overboosted feel of the electric power-steering system. Something also could be done about the chintzy plastic paddle shifters, which look and feel like afterthoughts and are of the frustrating pull-to-upshift, push-to-downshift type. Seriously, Ford—you ask $3000 for a honkin’ twin-turbo engine and don’t even toss in a decent pair of aluminum shift paddles?

Specifications

VEHICLE TYPE: front-engine, 4-wheel-drive, 6- or 7-passenger, 5-door wagon

PRICE AS TESTED: $39,995 (base price: $36,970)

ENGINE TYPE: twin-turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 24-valve V-6, aluminum block and heads, direct fuel injection

Displacement: 213 cu in, 3496cc
Power (SAE net): 355 bhp @ 5700 rpm
Torque (SAE net): 350 lb-ft @ 1500 rpm

TRANSMISSION: 6-speed automatic with manumatic shifting

DIMENSIONS:
Wheelbase: 117.9 in Length: 201.8 in
Width: 75.9 in Height: 68.0 in
Curb weight: 4825 lb

C/D TEST RESULTS:
Zero to 60 mph: 6.0 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 15.9 sec
Zero to 120 mph: 27.3 sec
Street start, 5–60 mph: 6.3 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 14.6 sec @ 96 mph
Top speed (governor limited): 123 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 190 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad*: 0.81 g

FUEL ECONOMY:
EPA city/highway driving: 16/22 mpg
C/D observed: 15 mpg

*Stability-control-inhibited.

Not Much Else Changes

Inside, the manumatic detent in the shift gate and those paddles are the only cues that differentiate EcoBoost models, which mean the search for more power hasn’t harmed the Flex’s expansive three-row cabin and impressive fit and finish. The wide, pillowy front seats rival La-Z-Boys for backside soothing, and driver comfort is further improved for 2010 by the addition of a telescoping function to the tilting steering column. Although our tester lacked the optional second-row captain’s chairs ($650) and console-mounted fridge ($795, Limited models only), there was enough room in the middle row with the three-across bench to erect a jungle gym. Third-row access and comfort are among the best in the segment, but low seatbacks make the space best suited for children or shorter adults. More than 80 cubic feet of cargo space and a flat load floor are available with both rows collapsed, but have patience with the power liftgate, which takes too long to open or close and fights you when you want to open it manually.

Exterior revisions are limited to a small EcoBoost badge on the hatch and exhaust finishers located on each side of the rear fascia. Otherwise, the Mini-Cooper-that-swallowed-a-school-bus styling remains intact, and it’s still refreshingly original in the sea of frumpy minivans and soulless crossovers.

Everything Is Relative, including Bargains

At $39,995, our mid-level SEL model (the EcoBoost engine is only offered on SEL and Limited trims) was relatively simple, the only option being a $3895 package bundling the 20-inch wheels with a 12-speaker Sony audio system and a convenience group of adjustable pedals, the power liftgate, leather seats, and heated mirrors. Although our Flex was in no way a stripper, opting for cool features like the panoramic sunroof ($1495) and the rear-seat DVD entertainment system ($1995) could quickly push the sticker into the mid-$40,000 range. Stepping up to the Limited model with EcoBoost ($42,840)—it includes unique exterior trim, navigation, the upgraded Sony stereo, and the SEL’s optional convenience features—and loading it up with options could see the price crest $50,000. We’re going to go ahead and call that a teensy bit insane.

So, yes, $50,000 is a lot of money for a soft-roading crossover that can only tow 4500 pounds and averaged a measly 15 mpg in our hands—so much for that V-6 fuel economy—but it’s still about the same as a base twin-turbo Lincoln MKT, which shares the Flex’s mechanicals but doesn’t perform as well, doesn’t look as good, and has less third-row headroom. However, there’s yet another way to look at it.

SHO the Whole Family a Good Time

Ford hasn’t produced—and likely never will—a two-box wagon version of the Taurus SHO, regardless of how awesome the one we built in 1993 was. But with the 2010 SHO bloating to 4300 pounds and casting a shadow closer to that of an SUV, it’s not really the zesty four-door we remember from the ’80s and ’90s. Enter this Ford Flex SEL EcoBoost, which for a couple grand more than a base SHO is less than a second slower to 60 mph and through the quarter-mile, handles almost as well, and has 44-percent-more interior volume. Heresy, some would say, but if you have a sizable brood and want a unique, practical, all-weather crossover that can haul ass as well as it can carry stuff, the turbo Flex is at least worth considering. Just be careful with the options.

2009 Ford Edge


Introduction
The Ford Edge is a midsize crossover sport utility that offers better fuel economy and road manners than traditional truck-based SUVs such as the Ford Explorer.

The Edge handles better than truck-based SUVs while offering almost as much cargo space. It's 500 pounds lighter than an Explorer, enjoys an edge of two to three miles per gallon in fuel economy and offers similar advantages over other traditional SUVs. Benefiting from all-wheel drive and a fully independent suspension, the Edge is easier to control than a truck-based SUV in the snow or on wet, slippery roads. Getting in and out of it is easier, too. Yet it gives up nothing in passenger and cargo space. In fact, the back seats in the Edge are roomier than those in the Explorer, a benefit of its design.

The Edge is not small. Considered a midsize crossover utility vehicle, the Edge competes with the Nissan Murano and Toyota Highlander. All of these vehicles are larger than they look, a result of their slippery styling.


We found the Edge roomy and comfortable with fully foldable seats for big cargo carrying. It drives well, with good performance from a modern V6 engine mated to a six-speed automatic transmission.

The Edge has a contemporary look we find appealing. We like its bold chrome grille. We think it'll please buyers coming from SUVs who want a rugged look with room for the family and assorted stuff. And we think it'll satisfy buyers moving from a sedan who will find they haven't given up much in the way of comfort, convenience and driving dynamics.

The Ford Edge was introduced as a new product for the 2007 model year. A Limited model was added for 2008 and new features were added. For 2009, there is a Sport version, which features 22-inch alloy wheels mounting P265/40R22 Pirelli Scorpion Zero tires and an eight-piece body kit to give it a sporty look. There is also the availability of a next-generation voice-activated navigation system, Sirius Satellite Radio Travel Link, which is free for six months, and an ambient lighting package that illuminates the footwells. Next Page

 
Latest Auto Collection | TNB